AI Content Review & Fact-Checking
Human research, editorial judgment and quality control for AI-assisted content that must be accurate, coherent and ready for a real audience.
AI can sound certain while being wrong
Generative AI can accelerate production, but polished language can conceal invented facts, outdated information, weak reasoning, inconsistent instructions and a voice that does not fit the audience. I review the substance, not merely the grammar.
- Claim verification and primary-source research
- Hallucination and contradiction detection
- Technical and logical accuracy review
- Citation and link checking
- Structural and developmental editing
- Brand-voice and audience adaptation
- Reading-level and clarity improvement
- AI response evaluation and rubric-based quality control
Built for high-volume workflows
I can review individual flagship pieces or work within repeatable editorial systems. For ongoing production, we can define acceptance criteria, source standards, escalation rules and a consistent feedback format.
Subjects where scrutiny matters
My review experience runs through AI and technology, education, legal services and healthcare: subjects where a confident-sounding error is the expensive kind.
Quality-control questions
Can you review content produced by any AI platform?
Yes. The review focuses on the final output, evidence and intended use rather than requiring a specific generation platform.
Can you build a review rubric?
Yes. I can help define measurable criteria for factuality, clarity, voice, safety, usefulness and required sourcing.
Can you rewrite rejected drafts?
Yes. Review can include comments only, targeted revisions or a complete human rewrite.
Producing more content should not mean publishing worse content
Send a representative sample, estimated volume, quality requirements and turnaround needs.
Email Krissy